<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.firedupamerica.com">
<channel>
 <title>Fired Up! America - Supreme Court Nomination</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Supreme Court To Review Texas Redistricting Map</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/323</link>
 <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051212/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_texas_redistricting_3&quot;&gt;The &lt;em&gt;AP&lt;/em&gt; reports&lt;/a&gt; that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the controversial Texas redistricting map that Tom DeLay engineered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that Samuel Alito considers that voting rights stuff as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-20-biden-alito_x.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;just a bunch of mumbo-jumbo.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/11">Alito Nomination</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/7">GOP Culture of Corruption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:04:41 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The GOP Must Be Getting Nervous About Alito</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/322</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The GOP must be getting nervous about the nomination of Samuel Alito.&amp;nbsp; There is no other explanation for their recent bizarre behavior.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/12/11/20396/961&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Matt Stoller over at MyDD&lt;/a&gt; points out that henchmen assigned to work the nomination are now issuing threats against Senators Kennedy and Biden if they exercise their role under the Constitution by actually trying to find out if Alito has the character and moral fitness to serve on the nation&#039;s highest court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And now, Senator Bill &amp;quot;Insider Trader&amp;quot; Frist is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/11/AR2005121100344.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;threatening the nuclear option&lt;/a&gt; to fend off a filibuster threat that has yet to be uttered by Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/11">Alito Nomination</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:34:57 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Weakened Bush Makes Political Play On The Court</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/247</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/31/AR2005103100180.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;President Bush is widely expected&lt;/a&gt; to appoint Judge Samuel A. Alito, to the Supreme Court today.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;This is an obviously&amp;nbsp;craven political move by a President weakened by scandals and political missteps.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Rather than doing what&#039;s right for the country, the President has decided to appease the most radical elements of his party in an attempt to shore up his political standing.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:30:48 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Memo To Democrats: It&#039;s All About Griswold And Privacy</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/griswold_versus_connecticut</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;Now that Harriet Miers has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court, we must now turn our attention to the next nominee.&amp;nbsp; Given the beating that President Bush has taken over Miers, there is little doubt that he will nominate someone with bullet-proof right wing credentials.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Given the numbers, it will be very difficult for the Democrats to block a nominee, no matter how disgustingly out of step they are with the views of the American people, but they can use the confirmation process to educate the public about just how far out of step the right wing cabal is.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;During the ill-fated Miers effort, there was peripheral discussion of&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/149/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Griswold v. Connecticut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Senator Spector probed Miers for her views on Griswold.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/anncoulter/2005/10/20/172029.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter took Miers to task&lt;/a&gt; for not immediately repudiating Griswold.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  1 Nov 2005 12:23:58 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Miers Has Withdrawn Her Nomination</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/241</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;According to ABC News, Harriet Miers has withdrawn her nomination to the Supreme Court. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;So now the only question is, will President Bush now do the right thing for the country, or will he give in the the darkest elements of his party&#039;s base?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:03:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bye Bye Harriet</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/237</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20051025-122642-6809r&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;With this news from today&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Washington Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, it can only be a matter of time before Miss Miers is withdrawing her nomination to the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Two longtime leaders of the conservative movement yesterday called for the withdrawal of Harriet Miers&#039; nomination to the Supreme Court. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;We expected President Bush to appoint a woman with the opposite judicial philosophy and paper trail of Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- our disappointment is acute,&amp;quot; said Phyllis Schlafly, founder and president of the St. Louis-based Eagle Forum. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Mrs. Schlafly joined pioneering conservative fundraiser Richard Viguerie and other, lesser-known leaders on the pro-family right yesterday in announcing the formation of a coalition, WithdrawMiers.org. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;They described it as a &amp;quot;multipronged campaign to urge the withdrawal of Harriet Miers&#039; nomination to the Supreme Court.&amp;quot;&lt;/strong /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:32:17 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Residue Of The Harriet Miers Fiasco?</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/harriet_residue</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;For five long years, the various elements of the conservative movement swallowed hard and overlooked their differences in hope&#039;s that the election and re-election of George W. Bush would bring their various and sometimes competing views of a conservative Utopia into being.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;But alas, it was not meant to be.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Now the arguments are moving beyond the simple question of whether or not to support the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court and&amp;nbsp;has begun to reveal the deep underlying fissures within the movement.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU05J10&amp;amp;f=PG03I03&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;In this&amp;nbsp;piece by Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council&lt;/a&gt;, ironically titled, &amp;quot;Taxing Our Tolerance,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;Perkins shreds Grover Norquist for his appearance before the Log Cabin Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:47:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Miers Views On Abortion</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/miers_amend</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;Yesterday, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/18/AR2005101800715.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;it was revealed&lt;/a&gt; that Harriet Miers once filled out a questionairre for Texans United For Life, saying that she would support a constitutional amendment to ban all abortions, except to save a woman&#039;s life.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;I suppose that the conclusion that you draw from that depends a great deal on what you already believe about Harriet Miers. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;If you think she has a keen legal mind, I suppose you could conclude that she must have carefully analyzed the legal situation and decided that amending the Consitution was the only way to resolve the abortion issue consistent with her anti-abortion views.&amp;nbsp; That would suggest that she believes that &lt;em&gt;Roe&lt;/em&gt; was rightly decided and that the only way around it was to amend the Constitution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:48:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Has Condi Rice Been Watching Too Much Guffman?</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/she_probed_me</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;Perhaps the Bush administration communications team should ban movie watching the night before national television appearances for senior administration officials.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Here are some of Condi Rice&#039;s comments regarding Harriet Miers on &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/17/miers.ap/index.html?section=cnn_allpolitics&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Fox News Sunday&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Rice said she has worked closely with Miers, the White House counsel and a former deputy chief of staff, on international legal issues such as a president&#039;s wartime powers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:23:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush-GOP Resort To More &quot;Faith Baiting&quot; On Miers Nomination</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/double_standard_on_faith</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1206541&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;ABC News&lt;/em&gt; is reporting&lt;/a&gt; that President Bush is now saying that Harriet Miers religious views are a big part of the reason he chose her for the U.S. Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Very interesting.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;node/4&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Do you remember back in July&lt;/a&gt;, when the Republicans said that any discussion of Justice Roberts Catholicism was off limits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Congressional Republicans warned Democrats on Monday not to make Judge John G. Roberts&#039;s Roman Catholic faith an issue in his confirmation hearings for a seat on the Supreme Court, reviving a politically potent theme from previous battles over judicial appointees.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/5">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:36:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Explanation For Miers</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/216</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;Many folks have been scratching their heads about the recent nomination of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court, trying to figure out what the President was thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a thought, perhaps the reason that he picked his personal attorney is that he was less worried about how the next justice might vote on overturning &lt;u&gt;Roe v. Wade&lt;/u&gt;, and more worried about how they might vote on an appeal of &lt;u&gt;U.S. v. Rove&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  6 Oct 2005 07:54:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another Bad Day At The Bush White House</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/another_bad_day</link>
 <description>
  &lt;p&gt;President Bush and Karl Rove are going to have a really bad day.&amp;nbsp; Here&#039;s how I know.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Much like Karl probably does every day, the first thing I did this morning was peek in over at Townhall.com.&amp;nbsp; Now bear in mind, the only place that Karl could usually find any friendlier an audience&amp;nbsp;toward &amp;quot;W&amp;quot; would be at a&amp;nbsp;Bush family retreat at Crawford or Kennebunkport.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;But not today.&amp;nbsp; If you take a look at their latest opinion alert, here&#039;s what you&#039;ll find:&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/michellemalkin/2005/10/05/159409.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michelle Malkin&lt;/a&gt; attacks Bush for expecting the right to be satisfied with what she calls the &amp;quot;coffee and donuts&amp;quot; defense:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/5">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Wed,  5 Oct 2005 07:06:08 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Not Even Second Rate&quot;: Conservatives Decry Miers Pick</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/204</link>
 <description>&lt;!--StartFragment --&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Throughout&amp;nbsp;his two terms in office, George W. Bush has been able to rely upon the consistent and unwavering support of conservatives and the conservative mainstream media for each and every one of his policy and political decisions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;However, with Bush&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/03/AR2005100300252.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;nomination of Harriet Miers&lt;/a&gt; to the Supreme Court, conservative opinion leaders are no longer willing to serve as his silent handmaidens and&amp;nbsp;have begun&amp;nbsp;speaking out angrily.&amp;nbsp; Witness &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/05_10_02_corner-archive.asp#078320&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the opinion of Rich Lowr&lt;/a&gt;y, editor of movement conservatism&#039;s flagship publication, the National Review, writing on the Miers nomination earlier today.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/5">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon,  3 Oct 2005 14:48:12 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush Nominates Roberts As Chief Justice</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/122</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/05/roberts.nomination/index.html?section=cnn_allpolitics&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CNN&lt;/em&gt; reports&lt;/a&gt; that President Bush has nominated John Roberts to be the Chief Justice, succeeding William Rehnquist, who died over the weekend.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/5">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon,  5 Sep 2005 08:11:05 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chief Justice Rehnquist Dies of Cancer</title>
 <link>http://www.firedupamerica.com/node/119</link>
 <description>
Chief Justice William Rehnquist &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050904/ap_on_go_su_co/rehnquist&quot;&gt;died Saturday evening&lt;/a&gt; of cancer. </description>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/5">Bush Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firedupamerica.com/taxonomy/term/3">Supreme Court Nomination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon,  5 Sep 2005 12:26:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
